Cathy Garry, pictured here in Ocean City, NJ, with her husband, James, was first diagnosed with breast cancer in 2003 and began treatment at a community hospital near her home. Just four years later, in 2007, Cathy learned she had a second cancer diagnosis – cervical cancer. Although the cancer initially went into remission, she experienced a recurrence in the fall of 2008. That is when she and her family sought the medical expertise at Fox Chase Cancer Center. Unfortunately, the cancer was very aggressive and following a courageous and inspirational fight, Cathy passed away in September 2009.
I had the pleasure of getting to know Cathy in 2008 when my colleagues and I treated her for her recurrence. She was a very special woman. Her family believes that those who met Cathy knew what a caring and compassionate individual she was. I couldn’t agree more.
Her family shares, “During her time at Fox Chase Cancer Center she received the best care possible. The staff of doctors and nurses at Fox Chase cannot be described in words. They are the most caring and compassionate professionals that you can deal with during the most difficult and trying time a family can go through. We cannot say enough about the quality of care our mother received while at Fox Chase.”
Her family continues, “Though she is physically is no longer with us, Cathy’s love and kindness continue to live on in all those that knew her.” Cathy’s three children and their spouses established Cathy’s Kids, a non-profit foundation that honors the memory of a loving wife, mother and friend.
The mission of the Cathy’s Kids Foundation is to provide comfort and joy to children currently dealing with the effects of cancer. The organization strongly embraces the idea that HOPE is the best weapon against cancer. Ring a bell? Love Versus Cancer … maybe so!
The foundation holds an annual Cathy Garry Memorial Golf Tournament to raise funds to send a family affected by cancer to Walt Disney World. For more information about the foundation or to make a donation, visit www.golfforcathy.com.
Despite three bouts with cancer, she never complained about her own situation or health. Cathy’s focus in life was always the well-being of others. They appreciate your support in keeping her caring and compassionate spirit alive. Cathy would be touched to know that children were being helped in her name.
As always, your support, generosity, and prayers are greatly appreciated!
Watch Cathy’s video here:
Last summer, an advisory committee to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) voted 12 to 1 against the full approval of Avastin, a drug used to treat some but not all forms of cancer, for the treatment of advanced and metastatic breast cancer. This was not the final word, and many oncologists and patients have been waiting for further decisions regarding Avastin and breast cancer.
Then, in June 2011, another FDA panel voted unanimously to revoke Avastin’s approval for treating metastatic breast cancer. The drug was deemed “unsafe and ineffective” by the six-member panel. Again, patients should be aware that this decision is not the final word on Avastin. FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg will make the decision sometime after July 28, 2011.
The FDA began taking steps to revoke Avastin’s approval for breast cancer patients back in 2010, but Roche, the pharmaceutical company that manufactures the drug, appealed the decision and lobbied for a second hearing. While Avastin might not have any noticeable or measurable benefits for breast cancer patients, the drug is still an important option for the treatment of cancer. The FDA has approved the drug for treating patients with colon, lung, kidney and brain cancer.
At Fox Chase, my research has shown some very encouraging results when it comes to prescribing Avastin for the treatment of ovarian cancer. (See last year’s article in this blog). Last month, I was invited to testify before the FDA panel in this latest hearing. While my research is primarily focused on ovarian cancer, I cautioned the panel that that Avastin might have benefits beyond prolonging overall survival in breast cancer patients.
Read my complete testimony here (June 28, 2011). In my testimony, I noted that several clinical trials involving Avastin have shown improvement in PFS for women with recurrent ovarian cancer. The FDA’s decision to pull metastatic breast cancer from the Avastin label could make it difficult for ovarian cancer patients to access this potentially beneficial therapy.
According to the Ovarian Cancer National Alliance, “One reason for this decision is that Avastin showed an improvement in Progression Free Survival (PFS) for women with metastatic breast cancer in clinical trials, but did not show an improvement in Overall Survival (OS). Dr. Burger notes in his testimony that PFS may be the best available endpoint in clinical trials for ovarian cancer. If the FDA does not consider PFS a valid endpoint for clinical trials, that decision could affect approvals for drugs used in ovarian cancer.”
Many patients have taken Avastin for breast cancer who have seen positive results, and many of them are understandably concerned by this news. Even if Commissioner Hamburg makes the final decision to revoke Avastin’s approval, it doesn’t mean that Avastin will never again be prescribed for breast cancer patients. However, without FDA approval, it is much less likely that the drug would be covered by health insurance.
As a surgeon who specializes in gynecologic malignancies, I thought it would be helpful to invite my colleague, Paula D. Ryan, MD, PhD, a medical oncologist who specializes in breast cancer, to share her thoughts on the topic:
“So is this bad news for breast cancer patients? In general the answer is no!”
“The available data suggests that for most women the response of their tumor to Avastin will likely be modest in both magnitude and duration and will come at the risk of potentially significant toxicity and significant cost that patients either directly or indirectly need to cover. Yet some patients, probably a small minority, have more durable responses.
Ideally patients, physicians, and regulatory groups would work together to determine which small subset of patients are likely to enjoy the benefit. Indeed, we currently have good tests for predicting responses to drugs such as tamoxifen and Herceptin but alas the equivalent predictive test doesn’t exist for Avastin.
The ongoing use of Avastin in colon cancer and a variety of other cancers offers the hope that a test may one day be available to identify those patients in whom Avastin may be a life prolonging drug. If that test were to become available it is likely the research examining Avastin in breast cancer would be invigorated. Until then, it is probably more beneficial that women search for options for the treatment of their advanced breast cancer and should consider participation in carefully designed clinical trials.”
As I’ve stated before, Avastin is just one treatment option that has been used in recent years for breast cancer. It’s important that patients discuss as many different treatment options as possible with their treating physicians. We know that no two cases of breast cancer are exactly alike and that patients respond differently to each treatment option. I encourage you to talk to your physician about specific concerns, or post your questions here.